Eight-Plus Appeals of Northwest Welcoming Meeting’s Expulsion
Procedurally, the course is straightforward: the appeals will be considered and acted on by the NWYm Administrative Council.
But on what timetable? Here the response of YM officials has also been straightforward: No Comment. No timetable has been acknowledged. So it could take a month — it could take a year.
This stonewalling reinforces a complaint heard in most of the appeals, about a lack of transparency and accountability by NWYM’s top councils. For those below, a strict deadline was imposed and requests for flexibility denied.
But for those above? They will act when they are good and ready, and those subject to it will take the decision, when it comes, and that will be that.
This corporate attitude also echoes the way the expulsion of West Hills was handled: announced just after the end of its annual sessions, when Friends were scattered and enroute home.
Most of the internal appeals couched their complaints about this “lack of transparency” and accountability at the top in very euphemized terms.
But this outsider can be more blunt: as Quaker process, it stinks.