Ambushed & Sandbagged At North Carolina Yearly Meeting
Wait — a section that was deleted from the Faith and Practice 48 years ago was to be magically reinserted on the spot?
Yeah. That would, among other things, get around the clear policy statement in the F&P that
“Such changes should be made cautiously and with an ample opportunity for prayerful deliberation.”
The F&P goes on to detail an elaborate, five-step process for considering proposed changes, which would take close to a year even in the best of times.
But not that Saturday. More details about that bit of, um, legerdemain will come in future posts. It only lasted half an hour or so. It certainly made hash of the F&P itself and that ever-romantic phrase, “Quaker process”; when the Clerk asked for approval, the shouts were loud, and the several vocal dissents were disregarded.
Done.
Soon I staggered out and headed home, pondering that the meeting I attend, and a few others, have suddenly had the targets hung on our backs again, maybe bigger than ever. Besides the damning text in the handout-now-policy, we were verbally referred to, more than once, as the few “stumbling blocks,” the main obstacles between NCYM and “peace and stability.”
(Oh. Is THAT what the sermon and hymn were about?)
Well, maybe I am an old fool. But the morning’s ice water splash cleaned my glasses, and I’m pretty sure I can now read the handwriting on the wall.