Update-Northwest YM Gay Expulsion: The Power In Posing The Question
With the trial balloon of a joint statement being shot full of holes; the Administrative Council met on October 13, and set December 9-10 for a special meeting of meeting representatives (to include one “young Friend” from each group) to deal with the matter.
And at this point, we come back to the opening question about how what is called “Quaker process” can be, er, managed.
Basically, it’s quite simple, and based on this precedent: once a decision has been made, to change or repeal it requires that the body “reach unity” to do so.
So the technique comes down to how the decision is presented.
The Case of Pumpkin Spice Cake
For instance: suppose a meeting decided at one business session to serve pumpkin spice cake at the Fall Festival. But then at the next business meeting, some said they couldn’t stand pumpkin spice anything. To remove the pumpkin spice cake, the meeting would need to “reach unity” to reverse its earlier decision.
But what if the Clerk was a big fan of pumpkin spice cake, and wanted to make sure it stayed on the menu?
And what if the Clerk knew there were strong divided feelings about the matter?
Then the Clerk could pose the question in a way that would ensure her desired outcome. How?
Simple: The Clerk could ask:
“Does the meeting wish to RESCIND the decision to have pumpkin spice cake?”
[The ensuing discussion is divided.]
Clerk: “It’s clear there is NO UNITY to change the menu.”
[Ergo, Pumpkin Spice cake stays.]