Climate Change: The August Deadline
By Gwynne Dyer — 31 July 2024
When you spend four years writing a book on climate change, you get to know most of the leading players. I have never seen them so dismayed.
“By August, if we’re still looking at record-breaking temperatures, then we really have moved into uncharted territory,” said climate scientist Gavin Schmidt in April. Well, 22 July was the hottest average global temperature ever recorded – and 23 July promptly broke that brand new record. Here we are in August, and it is not looking promising.
Gavin Schmidt is Director of NASA’s Goddard Institute for Space Studies. He was choosing his words very carefully when he used the phrase ‘uncharted territory’, because that is a frightening place to be.
Now, in one sense we have been in uncharted territory for several decades: our greenhouse gas emissions are driving global temperatures higher than anything we have experienced in the past. But at least we thought we had a map of our probable future.
It was the climate scientists who drew that map, starting in the 1980s. Their knowledge of the various processes that drive the atmosphere and the oceans has expanded enormously, and the computer models they have learned to build let us predict what will happen with fairly high confidence.
Meteorologists can now forecast the weather accurately for the entire coming week 80% of the time. If you only want a five-day forecast, it’s 90% accurate – and the same growth in predictive capability has happened for climate change.
We know how much stuff we are dumping into the atmosphere, we more or less know where the winds and the clouds will be, we have a real-time readout of the ocean’s surface temperature (the biggest single factor), solar radiation is almost entirely predictable – and so the climate scientists can draw us a map of the future.
That’s the chart that tells us how fast the warming will be (+0.18°C per decade, or a full degree about every fifty years), and more or less what the effects will be in terms of forest-fires, mega-storms, landslides and floods, or hunger, thirst and refugee numbers.
This chart of the climate future can now also give us some notion of where we will hit various feedbacks in the climate system on the way up: events like the loss of the Antarctic ice sheet or the Amazon and Congo rainforests that are second-order consequences of the heating our emissions have caused.
It’s a pretty daunting picture, but at least we know more or less where we are and what thresholds we absolutely must not cross if we want to preserve a habitable environment for eight billion people (or at least most of them).
This map of our climate future is fundamental to the choices we make and the decisions we take – but suddenly it has become unreliable. What the climate has been doing over the past year is not at all what the map predicted. The scientists call it ‘the anomaly’, and it puts us in uncharted territory.
Suddenly, in July of last year, the average global temperature jumped by around 0.2°C. It doesn’t sound like a lot, but it’s the amount of warming the climate models were predicting for an entire decade. It’s like it was suddenly 2034.
“What is truly staggering is how large the difference is between the temperature of the last 13 months and the previous temperature records,” said Carlo Buontempo, the director of the European Union’s Copernicus Climate Change Service. “We are now in truly uncharted territory and as the climate keeps warming, we are bound to see new records being broken.”
There was an understandable desire among climate scientists to believe that this was just a fluke event, and that the predictions of the climate models are still fundamentally correct. Many tried to pin the blame on El Niño, a cyclical ocean event that causes higher temperatures in the eastern Pacific every three to seven years.
It was never very convincing, because El Niño only got underway months after the ‘anomaly’ appeared. It wasn’t particularly strong, as these things go, and it was over by this April. But Gavin Schmidt suggested waiting another three months, until August, before we collectively admit that this is something different. The three months are up, and it is.
This is almost certainly connected with the far-too-early category 5 hurricane that trailed devastation across the Caribbean in June, the wildfires that are eating up whole towns in the Canadian and US west, and all the other signs and portents of a climate warming much faster than we expected.
So the scientists have to work out what is causing it, and the rest of us have to figure out what, if anything, we can do about it apart from brace ourselves. That’s what ‘uncharted territory’ looks like.
Aloha, all!
In 1869, Quakers invested in what eventually became Ramallah Friends School. It is still there.
In 1947, Quakers won the Nobel Peace Prize for 300 years of practicing the command: “Love thy neighbor.” The monetary part of the prize went to both American and English Friends Service Committees. American Friends were already working with refugees in Palestine.
In 1982, American Friends Service Committee published their report called A Compassionate Peace, A Future for the Middle East. It was possible to find a peaceful future then. The good advice should have been taken. It wasn’t. One can only say: When Friends give good advice, take it!
Joe Biden has recently been working on a solution to both Climate and Middle East crises by means of social, cultural and economic transformation instead of violent confrontation. Biden’s way has mostly been hidden from common views and daily reporting. His advice requires the whole world to report for work, not war.
Before the Israel-Hamas war started, Biden began strategic planning with the Arab States, especially Saudi Arabia, to help the region enter into an era of international cooperation by reshaping their infrastructure and contributing to the reshaping of Europe, Africa, Asia and the rest of the world. Saudi Arabia’s plan is published as, National Transformation Program 2020, which outlines the national goals for this decade, i.e., 2020-2030.
Biden’s administration has published The Jeddah Communique: A Joint Statement Between the United States of America and the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, dated July15, 2020.
The agreement noted first of all, the historic, strategic partnership formed eighty years ago between King Abdulaziz and President Franklin Roosevelt aboard the USS Quincy. The new agreement then went on to discuss future cooperation, especially in the matter of clean, green energy. Transforming world economies, away from oil burning to electricity producing and transmitting to neighbor states, will impact all regional and national economies, but especially impacted will be Saudi Arabia, the other oil producing countries of the Middle East, and the United States. Our economies are tied together by oil and the US dollar. Cooperation in this transformation is vitally important.
Controversially speaking, however, Saudi Arabia wants access to nuclear energy and to space exploration in cooperation with the United States. To keep Saudi Arabia out of the clutches of Russia and China, the Biden Administration is listening. Attentively.
The Brookings Institution has published its research called: A Way Forward on a US-Saudi Civil Nuclear Agreement, dated April 12, 2024.
That report was followed by The Carnegie Institution’s report, The Ratification of Saudi-U.S. Deal Looks Increasingly Unlikely, dated June 24, 2024.
Biden favors national, regional, and global stability, as well as economic transformation, and international security. Biden favors peace and prosperity through cooperation. He faces opposition from Congress.
When one considers how much money Israel, since its inception in 1948, has cost the citizens of both Germany and the United States and indeed the whole world just to guarantee its existence — saying nothing at all about its costly wars — the American taxpayer would re-think not just the moral burden placed upon our shoulders by the Israel-Hamas War, but also the total economic burden. And then comes the cost of reconstruction of Gaza-Palestine.
We seem to be purchasing a home land for no one, a grave yard for every one in Israel-Palestine and beyond. Maybe it is sad, or stupid, or insane, but certainly it is costly.
The next election is not just for democracy. It is for strategic survival through transformational thinking and compassionate re-building and wise leadership. All are called. All will pay. How will Friends answer?
Kalei Luyben