God Help Us — St. Francis Has Come to THIS??

NOTE: When many of us think, read or  talk about the authoritarian religious right today, we reflexively refer to Protestant evangelicals.

Yes, most such fit that category; but they are by no means all Protestants or evangelicals. The Catholic church was was spawning and nurturing authoritarian cultures and polities long before Protestants or modern evangelicals came along.

In the U.S. today, these movements often collaborate; but they are distinct, with their own agendas and forces. The Catholics command many colleges, publications, think tanks, and billionaire backers. Further, they have clout: the rightwing majority on the Supreme Court is Catholic.  Among their many targets, the Catholic right utterly despises pope Francis, seeing him as a squishy liberal; one can almost hear them counting the minutes til his long-awaited demise.

Since 1964, a progressive (in Catholic terms) paper, The National Catholic Reporter (NCR), has monitored the internal struggles between the Catholic right and more moderate church tendencies, as well as interactions with other conservative groups. In this article, NCR reports on a Catholic right conference at one of its strongholds, the Franciscan University of Steubenville, Ohio, at which many of the leading intellectuals laid out their vision for a purified America culture.  The reporter is careful to maintain a judiciously non-hysterical tone throughout;  but read carefully and between the lines, take account of such neologisms as “integralism,” and “biblical lawmaking,”  and there terrifying visions and plans  lurking here. awaiting their moment.

 

‘New Right’ academics argue for biblical lawmaking at Steubenville conference

NCR – Steubenville, Ohio — October 17, 2022 — By Brian Fraga

Franciscan University of Steubenville, the conservative Catholic university in eastern Ohio, hosted a two-day conference in October where leading “New Right” nationalists, “post-liberal” conservatives and Catholic integralists declared that America’s “liberal consensus” has come to an end.

Several speakers articulated a vision of the United States where domestic manufacturing is not only revived and globalization reigned in, but where traditional Christian morality is restored to a central place in society and mainstream culture, and where leaders in government are comfortable using political power to enforce those religious values and punish “woke” progressives.

“Overt biblically grounded lawmaking, a concomitant biblically informed constitutional jurisprudence, and an approach to God in the public square that we might think of as an ecumenical integralism, represents our only hope for recovery at this late hour in our ailing, decadent republic,” Josh Hammer, a Newsweek opinion editor, said during one panel discussion.

The conference, entitled “Restoring a Nation: The Common Good in the American Tradition” and held Oct 7-8, featured a who’s who lineup of influential speakers in the national conservative movement, where grassroots momentum has been building on the right since former President Donald Trump in 2016 shook up the Republican establishment with his nationalistic rhetoric, hardline partisanship and bare-knuckled style of political combat against his liberal critics.

Disaffected by secularization, social media censorship, the legal recognition of same-sex marriage and the widening societal acceptance of LGBTQ rights, the conference speakers described an America in crisis, where tyrannical forces in “Big Tech,” media, academia, government and industry are cracking down on and isolating social conservatives and religious traditionalists in the United States.

“Look around you. … Does the world look free?” said Sohrab Ahmari, a former New York Post op-ed editor and current fellow at Franciscan University’s Veritas Center for Ethics in Public Life, who helped organize the conference. Ahmari spoke about “privatized coercion” in the market economy that he said subjugates American consumers and workers.

“If China treated workers the way Amazon does, American elites would be outraged,” Ahmari said.

Rachel Bovard, senior director of policy at the Conservative Partnership Institute think tank, attacked the “woke industrial complex,” which she described as the “axis of Big Tech, Chinese and corporate totalitarianism.” She characterized the Pentagon — which in 2021 announced new guidelines to allow transgender people to enlist and serve openly — as “woke.”

“If the last 30 years has taught us anything, it’s that the left’s fascist orgy is not somehow going to abate,” Bovard said. “No one knows what lunacy is coming next, but we all know what’s eventually coming: normalized pederasty, forced euthanasia, postnatal abortion, persecuting dissident faiths, disqualifying religious traditionalists and political conservatives from banking, property rights and public benefits.”

To prevent that dystopian future, several conference speakers called for a restoration of Christian values, where abortion and gender reassignment surgeries are outlawed, traditional marriage and large families are supported by generous state subsidies and paid parental leave, where prayer is readmitted to public schools and commerce is banned on Sundays.

“Another world is possible, namely, Hungary,” said Gladden Pappin, a University of Dallas political scientist who has lauded the regime of Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orban, a populist authoritarian who has been criticized in western Europe for turning Hungary into an “illiberal democracy” where freedoms of the press and judiciary are curtailed.

Post-liberal” speakers such as Chad Pecknold, a theology professor at the Catholic University of America, said establishment Republicans and mainstream conservatives who espouse neoliberal principles such as limited government, deregulation and free market capitalism are incapable of countering “left liberal materialism.”

“You can’t respond to left liberalism with liberalism,” said Pecknold, who like other speakers criticized the idea of a “values neutral” or secular public square where the state does not endorse a religious framework or societal outlook. Pecknold spoke of the necessity of a “public orientation to God,” which he said could be reflected “in concrete ways” with certain national holidays, civic liturgies and “sabbath” laws.

“A perfect society has elevating power to unite us to our final end, which is God,” Pecknold said.

Though the U.S. Constitution’s First Amendment prohibits the establishment of an official state religion, several of the conference’s Catholic speakers articulated their dissatisfaction with a religiously neutral American civil society.

Left to right: Rusty Reno of First Things, Catholic University of America theology professor Chad Pecknold, and Franciscan University of Steubenville scripture and theology professor Scott Hahn sit for a panel during the Oct. 7-8 conference, “Restoring A Nation: The Common Good in the American Tradition,” at Franciscan University of Steubenville. (NCR photo/Brian Fraga)

“The idea that a civil society should be neutral between authentic sacraments and their parodies, between the life of grace and the life of vain self-reliance, is incoherent, amoral and ultimately self-defeating,” said Scott Hahn, a Franciscan University theology and scripture professor who has become well known in Catholic circles for his appearances on EWTN, the conservative Catholic media conglomerate.

Hahn bemoaned the United States’ current political and social order that he said does not allow the “sacramental nature of society to flourish,” which he described as a “denial of reality” since he said human beings “are not just social animals, but ecclesial animals too.”

Mary Imparato, chairwoman of political science at Belmont Abbey College, recalled a trip to Washington as a young woman where she said she found herself disagreeing with other Catholic students who were not comfortable with the idea of contraception being banned by law or an image of the Virgin Mary one day replacing the Statue of Freedom atop the U.S. Capitol building.

Harvard Law Professor Adrian Vermeule, who has advocated for the kind of “common-good constitutionalism that would empower the state to legislate public morality, also spoke at the conference. He focused his remarks on defending the authority of the federal bureaucracy, also called the “administrative state,” to uphold the common good.

“There is no alternative to the administrative state. There is no dismantling of it. To dismantle it would be to dismantle the American constitutional order,” said Vermeule, who also defended the prerogatives of federal agencies in a panel entitled, “The Wisdom of the New Deal Tradition.”

Harvard Law professor Adrian Vermeule speaks on the American administrative state during the Oct. 7-8 conference, “Restoring A Nation: The Common Good in the American Tradition,” at Franciscan University of Steubenville. (NCR photo/Brian Fraga)

“The New Deal was a spectacular success,” Vermeule said. Patrick J. Smith, a contributor to The Josias, an online journal of Catholic integralist thought, said during the panel that reexamining the New Deal in a favorable light had been “an unbroken thread” in the conference.

The national conservative-integralist embrace of President Franklin D. Roosevelt’s expansive New Deal project marks a significant point of departure from the mainstream conservatism that since President Ronald Reagan in the 1980s has espoused small government, laissez-faire economics and free trade. Those policies, several speakers at the Franciscan University conference said, have resulted in deindustrialization, hollowed-out cities in the Rust Belt, frayed social bonds, and the kind of hopelessness and despair in those communities that have exacerbated the national opioid crisis.

“This is our world. This is what we see every day, and this is what we accept as normal, of what progress looks like. This might even be what we call the blessings of liberty, the way it is,” said Patrick Deneen, a University of Notre Dame political science professor and leading post-liberal academic.

Deneen showed the audience photographs of German and American cities, taken before and after World War II. He said the United States adopted the Marshall Plan to rebuild German cities to their former glory but allowed places like Detroit, Steubenville and South Bend, Indiana, to fall victim to ruthless global market forces.

“I want to suggest that we actually lost the war,” Deneen said. “What we’re seeing is evidence of a kind of bombardment, of a literal destruction of our nation, that has been in a sense a war fought against us, or certainly the people in these places.”

University of Notre Dame professor Patrick Deneen declares that "another world is possible" in a talk he delivered during the Oct. 7-8 conference, "Restoring A Nation: The Common Good in the American Tradition." (NCR photo/Brian Fraga)

University of Notre Dame professor Patrick Deneen declares that “another world is possible” in a talk he delivered during the Oct. 7-8 conference, “Restoring A Nation: The Common Good in the American Tradition,” at Franciscan University of Steubenville. (NCR photo/Brian Fraga)

Echoing progressive critiques of unfettered capitalism, Rusty Reno — the editor of the conservative First Things journal — told the Franciscan audience that capitalism has “imperial ambitions.” He also said that capitalism makes “alluring promises of prosperity and freedom” but instead delivers “many forms of bondage and many pathologies.”

“This is the time to think heretical thoughts, and I think that’s much needed in 2022,” said Reno, who called on the American political right to rethink its longstanding belief that markets are self-correcting and self-limiting, a position he dismissed as utopian.

On matters of political and economic policy, Hammer, the Newsweek opinion editor, said the New Right “is more nationalistic, more communitarian and invested in cultivating and advancing the material conditions” of “real people who lead real lives.” He espoused protective tariffs and “prudential antitrust enforcement to prevent corporate tyranny.”

But while centering economic policy proposals on the nuclear family, Hammer suggested that culture war issues are at “the very heart and soul of the New Right.” He said the movement supports proposals such as extending the U.S. Constitution’s 14th Amendment’s equal protection clause to unborn children, banning gender reassignment surgery for everyone — not just minors — and overturning the U.S. Supreme Court’s precedents to return the Bible and prayer to public schools.

“The New Right recognizes the only viable force capable of withstanding and turning back the woke onslaught is religion, which in America means Christianity,” said Hammer, who suggested that using the state to subdue progressives can be “both popular and successful.”

A politician who has aligned himself with the national conservatism on display at Franciscan University is J.D. Vance, a first-time Republican candidate running for the open U.S. Senate seat in Ohio. Vance, author of the bestselling memoir Hillbilly Elegy, was the conference’s final speaker. He described life on the campaign trail, the importance of raising money as a candidate, and a “ruling class” that he said is corrupt and despises working-class people.

“It’s not easy to be on the vanguard of a new Republican Party when so many people are getting rich off doing things the old way,” Vance said. The audience of roughly 200 people, nearly all of them white, gave him a standing ovation.

Brian Fraga

Brian Fraga is NCR staff reporter.

5 thoughts on “God Help Us — St. Francis Has Come to THIS??”

  1. I wonder if the ‘Catholic Right’ of this nature only exists in America? Here a very different understanding of the ‘sacramental’ compared with that Quakers generally think of it as:
    BYM QF&P Chapter 27 » 27.43
    Friends and the Christian church
    Sacraments
    We need to guard against under-valuing the material expressions of spiritual things. It is easy to make a form of our very rejection of forms. And in particular, we need to ask ourselves whether we are endeavouring to make all the daily happenings and doings of life which we call ‘secular’ minister to the spiritual. It is a bold and colossal claim that we put forward – that the whole of life is sacramental, that there are innumerable ‘means of grace’ by which God is revealed and communicated – through nature and through human fellowship and through a thousand things that may become the ‘outward and visible sign’ of ‘an inward and spiritual grace’.
    A Barratt Brown, 1932

    I suppose Quakers probably rather like Pope Francis. (We’ve moved on a bit since our early ‘anti-papist’ days).

    Is this just another example of ‘Only in America’?

    1. Trevor,
      I am not familiar with all national Catholic communities, but I know that, alas, there are reactionary & authoritarian strains of it in many places other than the USA. But there are also, I hasten to add, progressive & generous & Christlike Catholics too.

  2. re: Franciscan University

    The irony is complete.

    Francis was not burned at the stake — for refusing to have a monastery built for him and then living in it — only because his family had clout. The idea that the poor should be served was, and is, subversive to those with the most.

    After his death, many of his followers did hie themselves to monasteries. Those who didn’t ended up dead from various painful means.

    Plus ça change.

    As a general rule, it’s useful to look at oneself from the lens that tars others.

    How many Quakers live among those with less and work to better their lives?

    1. For that matter, William Penn risked a life sentence in one case, and execution by beheading in at least two more, all on behalf of his peaceful Quaker witness.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.