“Orthodoxy and heterodoxy cannot coexist in one and the same person or organization,” evangelical Quaker leader Edward Mott thundered in 1946, as New England Yearly Meeting adopted its reunification proposals. “It has been, and is being attempted, but the result is always the same, namely failure.” And again: “All such interminglings should be canceled in the interest of truth and vital influence for Christ and His Church.”
Does this sound familiar? Seventy years later, the arguments have not really changed. Yet the reconstituted New England Yearly Meeting is still around (as, for that matter, is Oregon, now Northwest). And the verdict of experience points in a different direction: dual affiliation, in specially conducive circumstances (as in Philadelphia’/New York) can be very healing. But usually it is no big deal. When it serves a meeting community’s interests, it can work; if it doesn’t, it will eventually be set aside.
And crusades against it are little other than part of doctrinal purges, which are much more like the biblical plagues, as NCYM ought to be figuring out.
I won’t dissemble here.
Have we had enough of attempted doctrinal purges yet? I hope so. And if we have, then let’s also hope that North Carolina Friends will push this minor, manufactured problem of dual affiliation off the YM agenda.
Read more →